One consistent theme we've heard lately among pessimistic analysts and investors is that slower growth abroad is a headwind for economic growth in the US. Softness in Europe or China, they say, bodes poorly for the continuation of US expansion. The standard theory, the conventional wisdom, is that slower growth abroad means slower growth in US exports.
Superficially, there is some data to back up that theory. Over the past four quarters, real GDP expanded 1.5% in the 28 countries that make up the European Union, the slowest pace since 2013. China's real GDP is up 6.4% from a year ago, the slowest gain in decades.
We have some relatively good recent news out of Japan, where real GDP expanded at a 2.1% annual rate in the first quarter. But real GDP in Japan is up only 0.8% from a year ago versus a healthier 1.4% gain the years ending in the first quarter of 2017 and 2018. (Remember, Japan's population has been shrinking so their GDP growth rates have been, and will remain, persistently lower than in the US).
By contrast, US growth has been accelerating. Real GDP rose at a 3.2% annual rate in the first quarter, and was up 3.2% from a year ago, at least according to the report released a month ago. A revised report on GDP arrives Thursday, and we anticipate mild downward revisions on net, but the figure for first quarter growth should remain near 3.0%.
The recent trend in real GDP growth is a clear acceleration from the average annualized growth rate of 2.2% seen during the Plow Horse recovery from mid-2009 through early 2017. Even more impressive is the acceleration in productivity growth, which averaged 1.1% annualized during the Plow Horse era but grew 2.4% in the past year.
In other words, the data already contradict the pessimistic theory that slow growth abroad will cause the US to decelerate.
So why is this happening? What could explain why the US has been so resilient relative to major economies abroad?
Under "normal" conditions, the pessimistic theory could make sense. If foreign countries have less purchasing power, then, yes, that could be a headwind for the US. Imagine a town where the local ranchers produce less; yes, obviously that can be a problem for local restaurants and merchants who sell to those ranchers.