Have markets overreacted in Asia to news of a trade war and tighter money?
Market performance of Asian indices has seen some significant declines since their peak in late January. Indonesia and the Philippines are down over -20%, and even the more protected markets of Hong Kong and Australia are down -9% and -5%, respectively. What is driving this?
It may be surprising but it is not actually fundamentals driving the weakness. Corporate performance has been pretty strong. Earnings growth has averaged about 5% for Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries and has been higher in China and Japan. That is a decent performance. None of this is surprising—I have mentioned the strong structural forces underpinning long-term nominal GDP growth. Recently, I also have stressed the reacceleration of earnings growth as governments taper off the pro-labor, pro-wage policies of the past few years. And although the conventional wisdom among foreign investors is that Asia is “export-driven,” our view is that productivity growth and domestic demand drive the region's growth. So, there seems to be a disconnection between sentiment and reality.
Both valuations and currencies have declined. But the declining valuations are more noticeable—those falling price-to-earnings ratios that seem to suggest investors expect trade wars and monetary policy to have significant long-term effects. I doubt these worries are realistic—trade effects can be large in a few industries but they are not particularly meaningful for the majority of the economy. And however the U.S. decides to treat international trade, China, Asia and Europe can continue to embrace globalization even without the U.S.'s full participation.