Gold has performed surprisingly well this year. Russ discusses why that might not be the case going forward, and it may be time to pare positions.
For a year in which risky assets continue to grind higher, assets offering potential hedges against those risks are doing remarkably well. Long-duration U.S. bonds are up roughly 9% while gold has advanced better than 11%. The latter’s performance is particularly surprising.
Gold is up in an environment in which investors have had little reason to hedge; any market pullback has been both mild and fleeting. Yet gold has kept pace with the overall returns of a typical 60/40 portfolio. In other words, this has been an unusual year in that your hedges have not cost you anything in the form of foregone returns.
That said, I would be inclined to hold a bit less gold into year’s end and early 2018. My message: Trim, but don’t abandon, the asset class. Here’s why.
Back in late August I discussed the relationship between gold, political uncertainty and tax reform. While still not a sure thing, the odds of tax reform have risen since late summer. Fiscal stimulus in the form of a tax cut would arguably undermine gold in two ways: marginally higher real, or inflation-adjusted, interest rates, and less political uncertainty. As discussed in previous blogs, the best predictor of gold’s performance is the level of real rates. Marginally faster growth, even if only modest and temporary, is likely to put some upward pressure on real rates and correspondingly downward pressure on gold.
2. The U.S. dollar
One reason gold has done as well as it has year-to-date is weakness in the dollar. The U.S. Dollar (DXY) Index is down more than 9% from its early January high. More recently, however, the dollar has been firmer as investors have repositioned for a slightly more aggressive Federal Reserve (see the accompanying chart). In the near term I would expect a steadier dollar, particularly if the proposed tax cuts pass. A firm dollar removes another support for gold.