The Fed kept rates unchanged in a unanimous decision.
The statement reinforced the high likelihood of a December rate hike.
Looking ahead, two-to-three hikes look likely in 2018.
Much to no one’s surprise the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) did not raise the federal funds rate; and the decision was unanimous. Bloomberg’s World Interest Rate Probability (WIRP) function had virtually 0% as the likelihood of a rate hike at the November meeting. But also in keeping with WIRP—which is above a 90% probability for a December rate hike—officials gave no indication that its expectations for a third interest rate increase this year have been derailed. The Fed repeated its assessment that while inflation may “remain somewhat below 2% in the near term,” it’s expected to stabilize around the Fed’s 2% target “over the medium term.” The Fed also upgraded its characterization of recent economic growth from “rising moderately” to “solid.” Couple these with its assessment that “the labor market has continued to strengthen and that economic activity has been rising at a solid rate despite hurricane-related disruptions,” we believe it reinforces that a hike will come next month.
There were fairly minor tweaks to the official statement accompanying the announcement, other than the reference to the hurricanes. Next on the docket for Fed watchers is President Trump’s nomination of the new Federal Reserve Chair—expected tomorrow. This arguably has more significance than today’s announcement and/or statement. Fed governor Jerome Powell is the favorite by a wide margin. As Kathy Jones, Schwab’s Chief Fixed Income Strategist recent wrote in an internal note:
“He’s a Republican, has experience at the Fed and is seen as a steady hand and consensus builder. He has expressed some concern about over-regulation of the banks, although he has never suggested altering regulations, nor has he ever dissented during his time on the board [of governors]. Powell would be a Halloween treat for the markets—conservative, likely to go along with reduced banking regulation, but not doctrinaire.”