The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet has been grabbing headlines recently, and with good reason: the Fed’s three massive bond buying programs, used to stimulate the US economy during and after the 2008 financial crisis, have left the central bank holding trillions of dollars worth of Treasury and agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS).

Now that the US economy looks on track, the Fed has begun to raise interest rates, and it wants to begin normalizing the balance sheet “relatively soon” by capping the amount of money it reinvests in mortgages each month.

Some investors, wary of how the market may react once the Fed withdraws, have already pulled back from agency MBS. Won’t things only get worse once balance sheet normalization is officially underway? Not necessarily.

I believe agency MBS can modestly outperform US Treasurys over the next 6 to 12 months. Here are three reasons why:

  1. “Normalization” is already baked in: The Fed has telegraphed a very benign approach for reducing its MBS principal reinvestments, and MBS spreads have already widened to price this in. A look at the spreads offered on agency MBS and high-quality maturity-matched AA corporates illustrates this point. Both asset classes are sensitive to interest rate changes and offer a yield advantage over Treasurys, yet the corporate spread has tightened since the beginning of the year while agency MBS has lagged. I believe agency spreads are unlikely to widen substantially from here, and they could tighten.