Earlier this month, David Zahn, head of European Fixed Income, Franklin Templeton Fixed Income Group, set out some thoughts on the political and economic landscape for Europe in 2017. He deliberately didn’t talk in depth about one topic that is likely to take center stage this year—Brexit—because he felt it deserved a blog all to itself. Here, Zahn explains why he thinks the United Kingdom is in a better negotiating position than it’s given credit for and what effect the newly inaugurated President Trump might have on the process.

We feel generally positive about the prospects for a mutually agreeable Brexit deal between the United Kingdom and the European Union (EU). However, we don’t think it will be achieved without challenges.

Neither the UK Supreme Court ruling that the country’s Parliament must vote on triggering Article 50 to start the Brexit process, nor Prime Minister Theresa May’s January 17 speech setting out her vision for Brexit have dented that feeling.

During a visit to Brussels earlier this year, our European Fixed Income team had the chance to meet a number of European politicians and their general feeling seemed to be that Brexit was not a priority for anyone in Europe.

Instead, they suggested, Brexit was an issue for the United Kingdom alone. In our eyes that’s a misguided approach: We think Brexit is very much a European issue.

Although the United Kingdom may be most deeply affected, we believe there could be a sizable impact on other parts of the EU as well. Countries with particularly strong trade links such as Ireland, Germany and the Netherlands may find themselves especially impacted.

Furthermore, we believe the United Kingdom is in a stronger negotiating position than many commentators give it credit for, and the election of Donald Trump as US president may have strengthened its hand further.

Importantly, there’s the size of the United Kingdom’s current financial commitment to the EU. Estimates suggest the United Kingdom contributes around 12%–13% of the EU budget.1 After the United Kingdom’s departure, a big hole will be left for the remaining members to fill in the years ahead.

Notwithstanding Theresa May’s suggestion that the United Kingdom would leave the European single market as well as the European Union, we can see some value to both sides in a deal that would see the United Kingdom agreeing to continue making a financial contribution in return for access to the single market.

The Trump Effect

In addition, we think Donald Trump’s presidency could be beneficial for the United Kingdom’s negotiating position for two reasons:

First, Trump says he likes the United Kingdom and has hinted at the possibility of a quick trade deal. It remains to be seen how this deal will shape up but what’s important here is that the sentiment of trading with the UK seems to be more positive under Trump than under the previous administration. We think it’s significant too that UK Prime Minister Theresa May should be the first world leader to visit Trump after his inauguration.

Second, we feel Trump rhetoric around defense may strengthen the United Kingdom’s negotiating stance with the EU.

The United Kingdom has one of the largest militaries in Europe, and it’s one of only two major markets in the region spending more than 2% of its gross domestic product (GDP) on defense.2

Given Trump’s criticism of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which has underpinned European defense strategy for decades, we think European diplomats would be anxious to keep the United Kingdom onside and reluctant to adopt too aggressive a negotiating stance.

So, in our view, money and defense give the United Kingdom a more substantial presence at the bargaining table than many Europeans may believe.

It seems to us, also, that in recent weeks, UK politicians have been adopting a stronger tone in their public pronouncements, underscoring their determination above all to leave the EU. Theresa May’s speech on January 17, in which she set out her vision for Brexit, is an example of that.

On the other hand, some Europeans seem to have started to waiver in their resolve: In Germany for example, Chancellor Angela Merkel has hinted that immigration and migrant labor, which were previously non-negotiable, now might be up for discussion.

That’s important, in our view, because the Brexit deal will be done between the United Kingdom and EU nations, so it’s important to watch the sentiment in individual countries.