After finishing its best quarter in 30 years, gold extended its gains, rising more than 17.2 percent year-to-date to become the best performing asset class among other commodities, U.S. Treasury bonds and major world currencies and equity indices.
We are likely entering a new gold bull market, writes the World Gold Council (WGC). If so, it would be the first time since the previous one concluded in September 2011, when the metal reached its all-time high of $1,900 per ounce. Since 1970, we’ve seen five gold bull markets, each one lasting an average 63 months and returning an average 385 percent, according to the WGC.
Now, as reported on Mining.com, one precious metals analyst predicts gold could rise to $3,000 within the next three years. Speaking at the Dubai Precious Metals Conference this week, Dr. Diego Parrilla, coauthor of the book “The Energy World Is Flat,” stated that “a perfect storm for gold is brewing” as uncertainty over global central bank policies is deepening. We might have reached the limit of what quantitative easing (QE) programs and negative interest rate policies (NIRP) can accomplish.
Three thousand dollars might be an overstatement, but several prominent financial institutions, including HSBC, RBC Capital Markets and Credit Suisse, are currently bullish on the metal.
Drivers of Gold: The U.S. Dollar and Real Interest Rates
The U.S. dollar has been weakening relative to other major currencies, recently hitting an 11-month low of 94.06, down 4.8 percent year-to-date. Gold is priced in dollars, so when the greenback drops, the yellow metal becomes less expensive, and therefore more attractive, for buyers in other countries.
More meaningful to price movements, however, are negative real interest rates. When inflation picks up, making short-term government bond yields drop below zero percent, savvy investors turn to other so-called “haven” assets, gold among them. This is what I call the Fear Trade. In September 2011, when gold hit $1,900, the real fed funds rate was sitting close to negative 4 percent.
Zero Hedge found that since 2008, the correlation between gold prices and real negative rates has been particularly high, adding:
Based on a regression analysis holding gold as the independent variable, a negative 0.5 percent real rate level would suggest a gold price of $1,380 an ounce and a negative 1.0 real rate level would suggest a gold price of $1,546 an ounce… The potential for inflation rates to move upwards and match U.S. Treasury yields, which continue to be held down in the short-term, could create a 1970s-esque phase in real rates.
There were two gold bull markets in the 1970s, according to the WGC. The first, which lasted from January 1970 to January 1975, returned a cumulative 451 percent. The second, lasting from October 1976 to February 1980, gained a whopping 721 percent.
As of April 11, the 2-year Treasury yield has contracted 93 percent in 2016, the 5-year yield more than 32 percent. This doesn’t take inflation into account, which takes a further 2.2 percent from these yields, based on the most recent consumer price index (CPI) reading.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
|One-Year||Five-Year||Ten-Year||Gross Expense Ratio||Expense Cap|
|Gold and Precious Metals Fund||24.07%||-16.32%||-3.02%||1.97%||1.90%|
|World Precious Minerals Fund||26.49%||-21.56%||-6.62%||1.99%||1.90%|
|FTSE Gold Mines Index||20.65%||17.69%||-4.42%||n/a||n/a|
|NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index||11.02%||-18.60%||-5.21%||n/a||n/a|
Expense ratios as stated in the most recent prospectus. The expense cap is a voluntary limit on total fund operating expenses (exclusive of any acquired fund fees and expenses, performance fees, extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage commissions and interest) that U.S. Global Investors, Inc. can modify or terminate at any time, which may lower a fund’s yield or return. Performance data quoted above is historical. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Results reflect the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings. For a portion of periods, the fund had expense limitations, without which returns would have been lower. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance does not include the effect of any direct fees described in the fund’s prospectus (e.g., short-term trading fees of 0.05%) which, if applicable, would lower your total returns. Performance quoted for periods of one year or less is cumulative and not annualized. Obtain performance data current to the most recent month-end at www.usfunds.com or 1-800-US-FUNDS.