The Liquidity Surge that Will Drive Negative Rates
Advisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives.
Fed speakers repeatedly promise policy tightening is a story for next year or the year after. To quote Jerome Powell: "We're not thinking about raising rates, we're not even thinking about thinking about raising rates."
Short-term interest rates are approaching zero percent and will likely be negative shortly. The culprit is an unusual circumstance at the U.S. Treasury. As I discuss, the Fed may have no choice but to tighten monetary policy to offset the condition.
For investors banking on continuing massive stimulus, what unexpectedly lies ahead may not be the same as the road we have been traveling.
Andreas Steno Larsen of Nordea Bank wrote a thoughtful article on a significant liquidity event on the horizon. His article, Brace Yourself… USD Liquidity is Coming, discussed an interesting development with the U.S. Treasury's cash account held at the Federal Reserve.
As shown below, the Treasury's cash balance was never above $400 billion before 2020. Now it sits at four-times prior record highs.
Over the last year, the Treasury borrowed massive sums of money to fund the CARES Act. It turns out it borrowed more than was spent. The extra cash now sits idle at the Federal Reserve.
In its February forecast, the Treasury estimated it will reduce its cash surplus to under $500 billion by the end of the second quarter.
Essentially, it will spend down the cash to meet demands. As a result, its borrowing needs will be small over the period.
Per the Treasury (LINK):
During the January-March 2021 quarter, Treasury expects to borrow $274 billion in privately-held net marketable debt, assuming an end-of-March cash balance of $800 billion. The borrowing estimate is $853 billion lower than announced in November 2020.
During the April-June 2021 quarter, Treasury expects to borrow $95 billion in privately-held net marketable debt.
The Q2 borrowing forecast of $95 billion compares to $600 billion of debt issuance in the prior quarter and a total of $4.3 trillion for 2020.
As I noted, new issuance of Treasury debt will plummet as the Fed uses cash on hand. At the same time, the Fed vows to keep purchasing $80 billion of U.S. Treasury debt every month. The graph below, from Nordea, shows that excess liquidity (QE plus the trillion-dollar plus reduction in cash balances) will rise substantially.
The biggest effects will be felt in the shorter-term maturity sectors, which account for the most debt issuance. Short-maturity debt remains in high demand as corporate and personal accounts want cash safety. The future supply reductions coupled with strong needs will result in lower yields. Further, the graph below, courtesy of Nordea's article, shows increases in dollar liquidity are most correlated with shorter maturity yields.
Short-term interest rates are likely to go negative unless the Fed acts.
The Fed has been crystal clear it does not want negative rates. It prefers the Fed funds rate to stay within its current target of 0.00-0.25%.
Below are four ways the Fed can drain liquidity in the money markets to offset the Treasury/Fed actions and keep rates positive:
- It can limit purchasing short-term debt and instead favor longer-term bonds.
- It can take that a step further by selling short-term holdings and purchasing longer-term paper. Most recently employed in 2012, such an action is called Operation Twist. However, because it involves selling, the Fed must buy more than $80 billion a month in longer-term debt to meet its monthly goal.
- The Fed may use its reverse-repurchase program (RRP) to remove liquidity. RRP, is a temporary swap of cash for securities. In this instance, the Fed would provide banks Treasury Bills in exchange for cash, effectively draining liquidity.
- A final tool in its toolbox is the interest the Fed pays banks on reserves (IOER). The current rate is 0.10%. The higher the rate, the more incentive for banks to sit on reserves and not lend them out. Reserves are the basis on which money is created. Therefore, the Fed can prevent more cash from being created by keeping the IOER higher than similar money-market investments.
The four operations above, or anything else it dreams up, reduce liquidity. Any reduction of liquidity is de facto tightening. If the Fed elects to keep short-term rates positive, how might other asset classes be affected?
Treasury yields – Yield-curve control
Yield-curve control (YCC) is typically associated with central bank actions to cap long-term interest rates. What I discussed above is the opposite. Essentially, the Fed would be setting a floor on short-term rates.
YCC is the Fed's attempt to shape the Treasury yield curve. Keeping short rates from going negative flattens the yield curve more than would otherwise be the case. If it employs either of the first two bullet points, a.k.a. “operation twist,” it will exert downward pressure on long-term yields.
The combination of reduced issuance of new debt and Fed operations, including buying more long-term debt, should flatten the yield curve. However, I add a caveat to that prediction with current inflation concerns. Long-term yields are rising in line with inflation expectations. Investors are balking at buying bonds with yields well below where they think inflation will be. Can Fed actions exert more influence than investors and push long-term yields lower?
How this tug of war ends, I do not know. I do know there will be a new bullish factor for long-term bonds entering the equation.
Unless the Fed allows rates to go negative, it must put a floor on money-market rates. In this case, cash depositors are somewhat assured rates will not decline.
Across the pond, the Bank of England warned its banks to get ready for negative yields. It is likely to follow in the footsteps of the ECB and the BOJ with negative rates. As shown below, investors and corporations are sitting on a lot of cash.
That cash will flow to the safest place it can earn the highest yield.
Foreign investors electing to partake in higher U.S. money-market yields must contend with currency risk. There is never a rate advantage when risks are appropriately hedged, using forward currency swaps and accounting for credit differences. In other words, forward currency rates reflect interest rate differentials. As such, if other countries further reduce money-market rates and the Fed floors domestic rates, the U.S. dollar is likely to rise.
The question of what happens to stocks is not straightforward. A flood of liquidity is coming, but it appears the Fed will try to absorb it. It's also unlikely money-market investors, content with cash safety, will suddenly chase riskier assets even if yields decline further. Therefore, the extra liquidity by itself may be a neutral influence on stock prices.
The recent weakening trend in the U.S. dollar is inflationary and a tailwind to higher stock prices. One concern is that a floor on U.S. rates, when global rates continue to go negative or more negative, should benefit the dollar. Any dollar strength will reduce said tailwind, possibly limiting more upside or even pressuring stocks lower.
The coming financial plumbing problems are just starting to percolate. The Treasury has no choice but to limit debt issuance and reduce its cash balances. The net result will be a wave of liquidity headed for the money markets. The Fed will need to tap on the brakes and at the same time keep its foot on the monetary stimulus pedal.
Event risk is rising. Asset markets may behave differently than they have as the Fed takes unusual actions. I urge caution as we are indeed in unprecedented times.
Michael Lebowitz is the founding partner of 720 Global and partner with Real Investment Advice. We assist our clients in differentiating themselves from the crowd with a focus on value, performance and a clear, lucid assessment of global market and economic dynamics. For more information about our upcoming subscription service RIA Pro, please contact us at 301.466.1204 or email [email protected].